FACTSHEET: SUSTAINABLE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
Philippines
Introduction
This Factsheet outlines the current progress in advancing Sustainable Public Procurement (SusPP) in the Philippines, based on a desk review. The review applies an analytical framework of six Pillars (or "building blocks") of SusPP systems.
The Framework is designed to make clear that countries do not need to follow a linear step-by-step path to build effective GPP systems. Rather it is important to examine local contexts and prioritize the Pillars with the most potential in the country. No matter where a country starts, a balanced approach to implementation calls for progress on all Pillars to some degree.
This Factsheet is organized as follows:
The Factsheet is intended to be a living document that will be revised and improved as new information is uncovered and advances are made. It is designed to support the ADB training programs on SusPP.
Country Overview
The Philippines Development Plan 2023-2028 specifically recognizes green public procurement as a policy priority, as a concept that has had national policy support since 2004. Quezon City, in particular, is leading the way on “clean construction”, working to reduce the embodied emissions associated with construction of buildings and infrastructure by 50% by 2030.
Climate change poses significant risks to the country. Made up of an archipelago with over 7,500 islands, the Philippines is ranked as the most vulnerable country to climate change and natural hazards. On average 20 typhoons occur annually, causing rising sea levels that could displace millions and warming oceans that threaten sea life, an important food source for the nation.
Significant infrastructure investments are at risk due to the country’s vulnerability to climate change, especially water-related hazards. During Typhoon Odette in 2021, 36% of seaports were rendered inoperational and some municipalities had limited communications services for six weeks. Mainstreaming resiliency and sustainability considerations in infrastructure planning and investment is a key priority, including by promoting innovative technologies including nature-based solutions.
>> Snapshot of Sustainable Procurement Maturity Level
Maturity Level:
Intermediate Stage
Key Achievements
Work underway
Potential pathways forward
>> Timeline of Implementation of Sustainable Procurement Activities
2003
2004
2013
2015
2016
2017
2021
2023
GPPB Resolution No. 25: Recognized the Public Procurement Roadmap 2017-2022 and approved list of Prioritised CSE and Non CSE products
Government Procurement Reform Act passed to modernize the national procurement system
Quezon City joins Global Lead City Network on Sustainable Procurement
Quezon City Green Public Procurement Ordinance of 2021 requires at least one environmental criteria
Philippine Development Plan (PDP) 2023-2028 recognizes SusPP as tool to expand domestic green markets
Executive Order No. 301/2004 (EO 301/2004): Established a Green Procurement Program in all Government Agencies
Philippine Development Plan (PDP) 2016-2022
set nation’s aspirations of inclusive and sustainable development including through public procurement
State of Play & Forward Looking Analysis
of SusPP in Public Procurement System
Pillar 1: Government Vision & Awareness of SusPP
Governments that establish a clear policy vision on SusPP can accelerate the shift from procurement as an administrative to strategic function, making clear how SusPP can deliver on important national social and environmental goals.
Progress to date:
The Philippines has set its vision to make GPP the norm in public procurement in the medium to long term. The country has a long-history of supportive policies for GPP, starting with the creation of its first national GPP Program in 2004, reinforced with further policies in 2013 and most recently in 2022. The Philippine Green Public Procurement Roadmap, adopted in 2017, emphasises that “no separate track for green” will be introduced, rather the goal is public procurement that is green throughout. To achieve this, a systematic, staged approach to implementation is set out:
The adoption of GPP is recognized as aligning with many of the country’s policy aspirations outlined in the Philippine Development Plan (PDP) 2023-2028. The PDP recognizes that in the post-COVID era, achieving the country’s climate ambitions will be difficult. It calls for action to promote resource-
efficient and cleaner production, particularly in the energy, transport and industry sectors. GPP is specifically recognized as a tool that can expand market opportunities for domestic manufacturing and production of green and climate-smart technology products.
The country’s GPP Roadmap admits that GPP for infrastructure projects is a complex aspiration that would need a separate roadmap as well as regulatory reform. In the meantime, GPP can be readily integrated into minor building upgrades in the field of repair work, lighting, paints, gardening, air conditioning, furniture and green building materials. Other potential ”green” entry points for building construction (e.g. office buildings, educational facilities, social housing projects) are noted, specifically the installation of solar panels and compliance with the green building standards.
Quezon City has emerged as a leader in setting a vision of “clean construction”, as a member of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group and Global Lead City Network on Sustainable Procurement. The City developed its own Green Public Procurement Policy in 2021. A 2022 study set out seven “highly recommended” measures in Quezon City, providing entry points for infrastructure projects to shift to clean construction:
Pillar 2: Legal & Regulatory Framework
Procurement law reform can be key to clear obstacles to implementation by establishing "value for money", not "lowest price", as a core procurement objective, and authorizing procurement approaches suited to SusPP.
Progress to date:
Public procurement in the Philippines is regulated by the Government Procurement Reform Act (2003) and its Implementing Rules and Regulations (last updated in 2021). The GPRA established a modern procurement system aligned with international standards that achieves anti-corruption goals and sets up a robust e-procurement system.
While current procurement legislation does not hinder adoption of GPP, amendments have been called for to remove potential obstacles. In particular:
Legislative reform could include explicit mention of the GPP and related concepts (i.e. life-cycle costing, total cost of ownership) integrated into the Procurement Act and IRR, as well as the Generic Procurement Manual and Philippine Bidding Documents
Pillar 3: Institutions & Capacity
Implementing SusPP requires assigning clear roles and responsibilities to agencies across government and actors across society, equipping them with the strategic knowledge and technical skills needed for success.
Progress to date:
The key institutions responsible for implementation of GPP in the country are:
The Capacity Development Division (CDD) of the GPPB offers training courses on GPP for both government procurement practitioners and the private sector. The GPP module has been integrated into the general training needs assessment for procurement training requests in the country. A total of 140 GPPB Recognized Trainers have completed trainings on GPP, along with an additional 40 Procuring Entities (as of December 2021).
Pillar 4: Market Practices
Market dialogue throughout the procurement process helps procuring entities to choose realistic sustainability criteria and ensure suppliers succeed in delivering on sustainability commitments over the contract duration.
Progress to date:
The Government of the Philippines recognizes that designing realistic pathways for GPP adoption requires the close collaboration of the private sector. Private sector representatives are invited as members of the central Government Procurement Policy Board (GPPB) and consulted to inform the solutions proposed by GPPB Technical Working Groups. When designing specifications for bidding documents, procurers are required to conduct a market survey to determine if there will be sufficient suppliers for the goods they wish to procure.
Since 2015, a “Government Vendor Engagement Day” has been held annually to present the upcoming procurement plan for the next year. Before enacting new technical specifications through the online procurement portal, PhilGEPS, suppliers have the opportunity to give feedback. This aims to avoid surprises regarding market readiness and availability of green items, both for the procuring entities and the suppliers. The theme of the 2022 Procurement Summit was “Building Strong Supplier Relationships towards Innovative and Sustainable Public Procurement”, with sessions focused on encouraging new business models for green products and services. The Summit highlighted green purchasing programs led by private sector companies such as McDonalds. An online green product directory has been proposed and is under development.
Market studies and consultations have identified several sectors in the Philippines ready to provide green products and services. These include: auto manufacturers and auto parts industry; pulp and paper industry; plastics industry; housing industry (e.g. pains, air conditioners, refrigeration, LED lights); and, furniture industry. A 2016 market study in these sectors came to positive conclusions regarding market readiness.
Pillar 5: Procurement Operations
Various tools and procurement approaches can be employed to help procurers more easily identify environmentally friendly goods and services and attract a competitive market response.
Progress to date:
The initial Green Public Procurement program launched in 2004 focused on advancing the national eco-label, Green Choice Philippines, to identify green products and technologies. However, the national procurement law prohibits references to brand names in bidding documents, which was interpreted to include ecolabels. This conflict hindered progress in GPP adoption for years.
In 2017, a new approach was taken with the development of technical specifications for the priority items. This approach focused on simplicity, noting that although “although comprehensive criteria are available, the best practice is to refer to a few, in some cases, only to a single criterion depending on the nature of the subject; paramount is the feasibility of the approach and a lighter green approach is often more appropriate than a dark green ambition that probably fails due to sophistication.” The technical specifications provide one to five green criteria per product category and encourage procurers to include at least one in bidding documents. The country plans to start with a focus on the initial set of 20 priority product categories and develop more technical specifications with time.
Other legislation sets out programs, incentives and minimum standards that can inform the design of green procurements. The Green Building Code (2015) sets out performance standards for energy efficiency, water efficiency, material sustainability, solid waste management, site sustainability and indoor environmental quality. The national ecolabel, Green Choice Philippines, has developed green product criteria for 40 product categories, including cement, batteries, fiber cement boards, ceramic tiles and automotive engine oil. The GPPB website acts as a central repository for knowledge products on green public procurement.
Pillar 6: Monitoring & Impact Measurement
Monitoring systems are essential to gather the information needed to keep SusPP implementation on course and communicate on the benefits achieved for the country.
Progress to date:
All government procurements are tracked through the online procurement portal, the Philippine Government Electronic Procurement System (PHILGEPS). The technical specifications currently proposed for the 20 priority items are designed to be feasible to meet and verify without unreasonable burden. Options for verification of green attributes include ecolabelling programs, such as Green Choice Philippines or through any of the nine testing facilities listed in the Philippine GPP Roadmap. Testing is recommended periodically, especially for large contracts. A relationship of trust between procurers and suppliers is emphasized as critical. In the case of faked product information, procurers can exclude suppliers from a contract, blacklist them from future contracts and request compensation payments.
The GPPB-TSO monitors the implementation of GPP across government through these measures:
As of 2020, the following achievements had been made:
Key Stakeholders
Driving the Sustainable Procurement Agenda
Resources
Projects Supported by ADB
ADB is working with Government Public Procurement Board (GPPB) of the Philippines to support the readiness and implementation of the proposed amendment of the Government Procurement Reform Act 2003 (RA 9184), as well as monitoring and evaluation of the sustainable procurement impact.
Other Initiatives supported by National/International Agencies
EU Switch Asia - Multi-year support to advance GPP policy and training, including development of the 2017 GPP Roadmap and follow-up 2020 Status Report.
GIZ - Support to install a permanent SPP unit in the Government Public Procurement Board secretariat and train GPP Focal Points across government agencies.
Resources
ADB Member Fact Sheet, 2023. Philippines.
C40 Cities (2022). Making the Case for Clean Construction Quezon City.
EU Switch Asia (2022). Philippines Country Report: Current Status of Green Public Procurement Implementation.
Republic of the Philippines, Government Procurement Policy Board,
Green Public Procurement technical specifications for priority product groups.
Republic of the Philippines, Government Procurement Policy Board (2017). The Philippine Green Public Procurement Roadmap.
© 2023 Asian Development Bank
Website & Factsheets developed by